I have looked at this since 1982 and the so called skeptics are simply lying about the Gauqelin material. I don’t have time now to go into details, but your sources re astrological research are terribly biased. The UK astrologer Robert Currey is the editor of Correllation, the only publication devoted to astrological research. He has also published a lot of essential material on the web. This is a very important page since exactly the same pattern can be observed on the political arena, where actors highjack pages for ‘dissidents’.
Wikipedia has been hijacked by ‘guerrilla skeptics’!
https://www.astrology.co.uk/tests/wp.htm
Research Sceptical of Astrology
Was CSICOP ever scientific and is CSI truly sceptical?
https://www.astrology.co.uk/tests/csicop.htm
Also related: Wikipedia Hijacked by Dogmatists
https://www.sheldrake.org/reactions/wikipedia
This kind of information should absolutely be included when only relying on biased ‘skeptics’ with a missionary agenda